Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
climateaudit.org | ||
| | | | |
patricktbrown.org
|
|
| | | | | More-severe climate model predictions could be the most accurate. | |
| | | | |
www.climate-skeptic.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text discusses skepticism towards anthropogenic global warming (AGW) by questioning the validity of climate models, the role of natural factors, and the reliability of data. It argues that climate models over-predict warming, rely on unverified assumptions like aerosol cooling, and may be calibrated to fit historical data rather than accurately representing climate processes. The author suggests that the models are not reliable for predicting future climate change and that the evidence for strong climate sensitivity to CO2 is insufficient to justify alarmist scenarios or policies. | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry I was invited to submit an op-ed regarding the recent Lewis/Curry paper on climate sensitivity. For background, see Lewis and Curry: Climate sensitivity uncertainty Lewis and Crok: Climate less sensitive to CO2 than models suggest Challenging the ... Continue reading ? | |
| | | | |
nca2023.globalchange.gov
|
|
| | | Appendix 4 of the Fifth National Climate Assessment | ||
