Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
mcyoung.xyz | ||
| | | | |
studiofreya.org
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
eli.thegreenplace.net
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | In my previous blog post, weve discussed the static constexpr std::integral_constant idiom to specify the size of a range at compile-time. Unlike the standard, our (think-cells) ranges library at think-cell already supports compile-time sizes natively, so I was eager to try the idiom there and see how it works out in practice. namespace tc { template constexpr auto size(Rng&& rng); // runtime-size of a range, like std::ranges::size template requires tc::has_constexpr_size constexpr auto constexpr_size = ... | |
| | | | |
bloeys.com
|
|
| | | In 'Thought 2: Regex is Like Assembly' I wondered why we are still doing regex in this kind of hard to understand, symbolic way, when we have already invented high level programming languages. There is no reason regex can't be written as clearly as any other programming language we use today. I thought doing this would be an interesting project, and so I came up with Regexl, a high level language for writing regex, that can be used as a simple library. | ||
