Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
tm.durusau.net | ||
| | | | |
bartoszmilewski.com
|
|
| | | | | This is part of the book Category Theory for Programmers. The previous instalment was Category: The Essence of Composition. See the Table of Contents. The category of types and functions plays an important role in programming, so let's talk about what types are and why we need them. Who Needs Types? There seems to be... | |
| | | | |
sophiabits.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
blog.drewolson.org
|
|
| | | | | I've spent a lot of time in the past year learning PureScript and it has drastically changed the way I think about programming in general. The biggest change in my thinking is described by the excellent blog post Parse, don't validate. The most important passage in the post, I think, is this: Consider: what is a parser? Really, a parser is just a function that consumes less-structured input and produces more-structured output. | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | Let me share a useful insight with you: constexpr is a platform. Just like you write code that targets Windows or a microcontroller, you write code that targets compile-time execution. In both cases you restrict yourself to the subset of C++ that works on your target platform, use conditional compilation if your code needs to be portable, and execute it on the desired target platform. You can thus view constexpr as another platform you can target; it just so happens to be run by your compiler. This insig... | ||
