Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
shipit.dev | ||
| | | | |
technicaldiscovery.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | While I was on-site working for a client, one of the developers I worked with would begin each day with a brief discussion of one of the ten... | |
| | | | |
atilaoncode.blog
|
|
| | | | | I read two C++ subreddit threads today on using the auto keyword. They're both questions: the first one asks why certain people seem to dislike using type inference, while the second asks about what commonly taught guidelines should be considered bad practice. A few replies there mention auto. This confuses me for more than one... | |
| | | | |
yasha.solutions
|
|
| | | | | A known thing - I am just posting this here as a reference Beautiful is better than ugly. Explicit is better than implicit. Simple is better than complex. Complex is better than complicated. Flat is better than nested. Sparse is better than dense. Readability counts. Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. Although practicality beats purity. Errors should never pass silently. Unless explicitly silenced. In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. | |
| | | | |
hiltmon.com
|
|
| | | |||
