/explore
|
You are here 
|
climateaudit.org | ||
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | UPDATE 1-12-11 A searchable database of all the 2009 and 2011 emails is here:http://foia2011.org Wattsupwiththat has the best collation of links and discussions here:http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/30/climategate-2-0-emails-thread-2/ Climate Audit is well worth a visit:http://climateaudit.org/ ====================================================== Our old friend 'Foia' dropped an interesting commenton the Ian Wilson thread at 9.28am GMT today. Downloading now, check it out at your... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry To date, I've kept Climate Etc. a "tree ring free zone," since the issues surrounding the hockey stick are a black hole for conflict and pretty much a tar baby, IMO. Further, paleoproxies are outside the arena ... Continue reading | |
| | | | |
noconsensus.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Files can be downloaded here. h/t - kurthbemis Mirror up at: http://dump.kurthbemis.com/climategate2/ ---- UEA Responds - And it's the expected BS. Out of context before we put them in context. I suppose that if you aren't a certified UEA climatologist, you can't read. I guess I'm probably not welcome at climate school... | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | Just as in Part I, in Part II I find numbers applied to fundamental concepts that are small but with uncertainty estimates I cannot reconcile nor find entirely credible. The entire topic of climate change appears to be like this; guided by numbers and measurements that need to be certain within 0.1% but are often 10 or 100 times worse. Is the cloud feedback positive? I don't know. There is a lot of weather to sort through to find out. However, if it is positive that is not necessarily a bad thing as explained in Part III. | ||
