Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
dailynous.com | ||
| | | | |
theelectricagora.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a philosophical and political argument against the concept of 'gender identity' as a distinct ontological category. It argues that gender identity, when articulated through expression and presentation, leads to ontological profligacy and divisiveness. The author advocates for retaining the ontology of biological sex, recognizing diverse socio-cultural expressions, and dropping the concept of gender identity. They also make a normative claim that discrimination based on gender expression/presentation should be illegal. However, the text acknowledges potential conflicts, such as with bathroom legislation, and suggests a balance between principles of biological sex and gender expression, while advocating for long-term social reori... | |
| | | | |
www.feministcritics.org
|
|
| | | | | Perhaps feminists are right about everything. Yet one would never be able to figure that out from the flimsy or nonexistent arguments that feminists provide for certain parts of feminist theory. Da... | |
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
|
|
| | | | | On 13 October, I published a short piece here entitled I'd like to have an argument, please. It was an invitation to any practising or academic lawyer who disagrees with my "gender critical" stance on the interaction of trans rights and women's rights to enter into a relaxed and mutually respectful email dialogue with me, | |
| | | | |
jacobinmag.com
|
|
| | | The welfare state wasn't created by enlightened dialogue or "sensible" moderate politics. It was a concession won by workers against bosses through decades of struggle. | ||
